Shale Maturation and the Drive for Technological Innovation
Never miss a thing.
Sign up to receive our insights newsletter.
In the oil and gas sector, two often overlooked yet critical factors are constantly shaping long-term value: shale maturation and technological innovation. These two forces frequently oppose each other, with the natural decline of shale wells (maturation) requiring innovative technologies to maximize remaining value. As these wells age and output declines, the role of technology becomes increasingly pivotal. But how do we properly evaluate the value created by technological advancements in mature oil fields, particularly from the perspective of intellectual property (IP) valuations?
Shale Maturation: The Declining Curve
The concept of shale maturation refers to the natural production decline experienced by shale wells over time. Unlike conventional wells, shale wells experience rapid initial production followed by steep declines, often within just a few years. This decline curve poses a challenge for oil and gas companies as they face diminishing returns from older wells. As production drops, so does the financial value of the well, which can significantly affect overall asset valuations.
From a valuation perspective, this maturation curve means that traditional approaches, such as a discounted cash flow model, often reflect reduced future cash flows and lower valuations as these wells mature. Without additional investment or improvements in operational efficiency, the assets’ ability to contribute to long-term value diminishes.
The Technology Curve
Technology in the oil and gas sector — whether through artificial intelligence, enhanced recovery techniques or more efficient drilling tools — has the potential to significantly extend the life and productivity of mature shale wells. Within the development of polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) drill bits, Rate of Penetration (ROP) is a key performance metric to monitor. ROP is crucial because higher drilling efficiency directly translates to reduced operational costs and improved overall profitability.
Technological advancements not only help mitigate production declines but also drive operational efficiency, reducing costs and enhancing profitability. These benefits are not just limited to traditional measures like reduced downtime, they also extend into newer areas like predictive maintenance, real-time data analytics and automation, all of which contribute to greater recovery rates.
Necessity is the Mother of Invention
The well-known adage, “necessity is the mother of invention,” rings especially true in oil and gas. As wells age and revenues decline, companies are pushed to innovate. The pressure to remain competitive and extract the most value from existing assets spurs the development of new technologies and recovery methods. The direct result? A race to stay ahead of the technology curve to offset the effects of shale maturation.
Tying it All Together: IP Valuations
The IP surrounding these technological innovations is an often underappreciated asset class in the oil and gas sector. Companies that develop proprietary technologies, whether related to drilling tools, data analytics software or enhanced recovery methods, hold significant value in their IP portfolios — but valuing this IP can be complex.
IP valuations often involve assessing the potential revenue streams generated by the use or licensing of the technology, along with the costs saved or the additional reserves recovered as a result of the innovation. For mature shale wells, the value of technological IP lies in its ability to extend the productive life of the asset, improve recovery rates and reduce operating costs.
Challenges in Valuing Technological Innovations in Mature Wells
Future potential: One of the key challenges in valuing the IP related to technological innovations is quantifying its future potential. While an advanced recovery technique may increase production today, the long-term impact on total recoverable reserves can be difficult to predict.
Risk and uncertainty: Technological advancements are not guaranteed to deliver results across all fields. The geological complexity of shale plays means that even the best technology may not work uniformly, introducing uncertainty into the valuation process.
Competitive edge: How unique or defensible is the technology? The value of IP is also tied to its exclusivity. If competitors can easily replicate or acquire similar technology, the long-term competitive advantage (and therefore, value) may be diminished.
The Future of Shale and Technology
The battle between shale maturation and technological innovation is not likely to end anytime soon. As shale wells continue to age, companies will need to stay ahead of the technology curve to extract more value from their assets. This, in turn, will drive further innovation, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in oil and gas recovery.
How can technology continue to transform and redefine the future of mature oil fields, and how do we accurately measure and assign value to these innovations? The answer lies in continuing to innovate while refining our models for IP and asset valuation to account for these dynamic, competing forces.
Contact us to learn more about Weaver’s work in IP valuations and the oil and gas sector.
Authored by Andrew Shotwell
©2024