Soon it may be easier for private companies to adopt specified alternatives to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. A recent proposal would provide a one-time option for these entities to elect an accounting alternative without having to conduct a test known as the “preferability assessment.”
Timing is critical
For many years, private companies and their stakeholders complained that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) catered too much to large, public companies and ignored the needs of smaller, privately held organizations that have less complex financial reporting issues. So, in 2012, the Financial Accounting Foundation (the FASB’s parent organization) established the Private Company Council (PCC). Its role is to amend areas of GAAP that are particularly difficult for private companies and advise the FASB on how to make them simpler.
So far, the FASB has issued only a handful of special alternatives for private firms. Companies that don’t elect an alternative on or before its effective date are required to assess the preferability of the alternative as described in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. While businesses said the preferability test isn’t necessarily onerous, in some cases it could block a private company from using the PCC’s simplified alternatives.
Proposal remedies missed cutoffs
In some cases, auditors might give private companies that miss the window of opportunity a hard time about justifying the use of private company accounting alternatives. But members of the PCC felt that there may be valid reasons for a company to miss the cutoff dates for these alternatives.
For example, a private company may not be aware of private company accounting alternatives when they become effective. Or a private company might not choose to elect the private company alternatives because it’s contemplating an initial public offering or merger with a publicly held business.
In the latter situation, public company stakeholders would want to see prior years’ financial statements prepared under GAAP. But, if these plans fall through and the private company has missed the effective date of the private company accounting alternatives, it could face a challenge trying to adopt the breaks after the window of opportunity has passed.
On September 30, 2015, the FASB released for public comment a proposal to make it easier for private companies to adopt special accounting alternatives if they missed the window for the effective dates of the alternatives.
If finalized, the guidance in Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. PCC-15-01, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Business Combinations (Topic 805), Consolidation (Topic 810), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effective Date and Transition Guidance, would let private companies have an unconditional one-time option to elect a private company accounting alternative without having to conduct a “preferability assessment.”
“Forgoing an initial preferability assessment could allow private companies to adopt a private company accounting alternative within the scope of this proposed update when the private companies experience a change in management’s strategic plan or circumstances,” the proposal says. “It also would allow private companies that were unaware of an accounting alternative to adopt the alternative without having to bear the cost of justifying preferability.”
Effective dates would be erased
The proposal would make the guidance in the PCC’s accounting alternatives effective immediately by removing their effective dates. In addition, the proposal would indefinitely extend the transitional guidance provided in the alternatives. Any subsequent change to an accounting policy election, however, would require justification that the change is preferable under Topic 250. The comment period for FASB’s proposal closed November 16.
Owners of manufacturing and distribution companies are often so focused on the here and now that planning for future catastrophes may fall through…