Top Five Emerging Risks Reshaping Internal Audit and How Boards Can Prepare
Related
Never miss a thing.
Sign up to receive our insights newsletter.

Boards, executives and internal audit leaders across industries are facing a rapidly changing risk landscape that is outpacing traditional oversight models. Extreme weather events are no longer outliers, geopolitical tensions are reshaping supply chains, artificial intelligence (AI) is accelerating cyber threats and data center expansion is putting new pressure on energy and water resources. Meanwhile, internal audit functions are expected to move beyond traditional assurance. They are increasingly being asked to offer strategic insight into emerging risks and develop action plans to mitigate those new exposures.
To strengthen organizational resilience, leaders must take a fresh look at emerging risks and reassess whether their enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks are capturing them effectively. The following emerging risks highlight where this shift matters most and outlines practical steps boards, leadership and internal audit teams can take now to prepare.
1. Escalating Risk of Underprepared Assurance
External risk drivers are rising in both frequency and intensity, and they’re growing more interconnected. There can be a tendency to treat risks in an isolated manner, which can mask their compound impact on operations, financial performance and strategy. Moving forward, stronger risk identification and internal audit coverage will be essential to avoid blind spots in resilience, continuity and strategic oversight.
Where risk is emerging
- More frequent, severe weather events disrupting operations and affecting dispersed workforces
- Energy and water constraints driven by rapid data center expansion and AI workloads
- Cyber threats and vendor/cloud exposures spreading across extended ecosystems
- Regulatory and geopolitical changes impacting compliance, market access and insurance availability
How to respond
- Refresh ERM to model compounding events across climate, cyber and utility dependencies
- Stress‑test business continuity plans to consider multisite, multihazard scenarios, including supplier outages
- Tighten third‑party oversight, cloud governance, risk identification controls and incident response plans
- Track geopolitical and regulatory shifts to keep disclosure controls current
2. Internal Audit Evolution and the Risk of Falling Behind
New Global Internal Audit Standards and increased reliance on technology are reshaping internal audit functions and how assurance is delivered. In like manner, internal audit methodologies must evolve alongside shifting risk paradigms to ensure audit coverage is aligned with the risks that matter most to boards and leadership.
Where risk is emerging
- Limited integration of emerging risks into audit scoping and prioritization
- Insufficient audit consideration of cloud, AI and digital transformation initiatives
- Continued reliance on static, checklist-based audit plans
- Adoption challenges related to new Global Internal Audit Standards and topical requirements
How to respond
- Strengthen continuous risk assessment and monitoring capabilities
- Shift toward risk-based, dynamic audit planning aligned to ERM priorities
- Increase early audit engagement in major technology and transformation initiatives
- Align audit methodologies with updated standards and emerging guidance
3. Human Skills in an AI-Accelerated Audit Environment
As AI and automation become integral to audit processes, the need for strong judgment becomes more critical than ever. Without the right skills, internal audit may deliver incomplete or misleading assurance, misinterpret AI outputs or fail to provide strategic insight. Therefore, courage and independence remain foundational to ethical auditing. Auditors must continue to have the ability to challenge when AI outputs conflict with strategy, controls or organizational values.
Where risk is emerging
- A limited ability to anticipate emerging risks due to breakdowns in judgment
- Overreliance on automated tools without critical analysis or context
- Skills gaps in translating technical findings into executive-level decisions
- Ethical and independent challenges when interpreting AI-driven recommendations
How to respond
- Invest in critical thinking, communication and influencing skills
- Promote training on AI interpretation, model validation and ethical decision-making
- Reinforce courage and independence in audit reporting and recommendations
- Integrate human skills assessments into workforce planning and audit capacity
4. Boardroom Challenges in AI Oversight
As organizations integrate AI into operations and oversight, boards face new governance and ethical challenges. Using AI for reporting or predictive insight increases risk about data integrity, bias, transparency and accountability. Boards should be cautious not to adopt AI faster than their governance frameworks have matured which can then create gaps in oversight.
Where risk is emerging
- Board reliance on AI-generated insights without understanding underlying assumptions
- Unclear governance policies defining acceptable enterprise-wide AI use
- Unauthorized or “shadow AI” adoption, creating security and compliance concerns
- Varying levels of AI familiarity among board and executive members
How to respond
- Establish clear AI governance policies, roles and escalation protocols
- Provide board-level education and training on AI capabilities, limitations and risks
- Monitor for shadow AI use and implement clear usage guidelines
- Integrate AI oversight into existing governance and committee reporting structures
5. Strategic Misalignment and Lack of Insight into Certain Risk
Boards increasingly expect forward-looking insight, not just retrospective assurance to validate what’s occurred. Focusing too heavily on compliance and legacy risks can create gaps as strategy evolves and oversight expectations expand. Without a clearly defined strategic role, internal audit’s relevance and impact at the board level may diminish.
Where risk is emerging
- Audit plans concentrate on historical control testing instead of emerging risks
- Limited involvement in strategic initiatives, digital transformation or major investments
- Siloed risk functions slow cross-functional awareness and response
- Board expectations for information that outpace traditional assurance reporting
How to respond
- Align audit planning with organizational strategy and emerging risk priorities
- Engage early in transformation initiatives to provide risk perspective
- Build trust and alignment by collaborating with ERM, compliance and strategy teams
- Use structured frameworks, such as the Blue Ocean Strategy (create demand in uncontested market space) to differentiate and demonstrate audit’s value
What Should Internal Audit and Boards Do Next?
Emerging risks are unfolding globally and compounding across operations, technology and governance. That raises key questions: How is your ERM framework capturing emerging risk? Do you have the right data and visibility to model tomorrow’s threats? And is internal audit positioned to deliver strategic insight, not just retrospective assurance?
If your organization is ready to elevate internal audit’s role and embed emerging risks more fully into ERM, Weaver can help. Our governance, risk and compliance professionals work with boards and leadership teams to strengthen alignment across risk functions, positioning internal audit to proactively anticipate disruption. Contact us.
Authored by Pree Wakharkar
©2026
