Article
Brochure
Executive Resource
Insight Hub
Ext. Publication
VideoSuccess Story: Rejecting a Zero-Value Equity Theory Results in a $10 Million Arbitration Award
Forensics & Litigation Services
Never miss a thing.
Sign up to receive our insights newsletter.
The Client
A former executive of a privately held company operating through a holding-company structure became involved in a dispute regarding the value of an equity interest and related compensation following separation from the organization. The matter proceeded to arbitration before a three-member tribunal under the American Arbitration Association.
The Challenge
The parties disagreed on the economic value of the executive’s equity interest under an established buyout framework. The company asserted that the equity had no value, relying on the taxable income of a nonoperating holding entity while excluding the operating business that generated the enterprise’s primary revenues and profitability.
The matter also involved questions regarding unpaid incentive compensation, the treatment of forgiven Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan proceeds and the appropriate financial measures for evaluating enterprise value. Resolving the dispute required a rigorous analysis of financial reporting, historical compensation practices and competing valuation methodologies.
The Process
Weaver’s team evaluated enterprise-level earnings, treatment of forgiven Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan proceeds and consistency with historical compensation practices. The work included analyzing the relevant compensation and equity frameworks, reconstructing historical financial reporting and course of performance, evaluating and rebutting valuation positions based solely on the holding company’s tax returns and quantifying economic damages related to the equity buyout, unpaid incentive compensation and interest.
Weaver prepared expert and rebuttal reports and provided live expert testimony at the arbitration hearing. The analysis focused on economic substance, accounting principles and consistency with historical financial practice:
- Enterprise-level economics: Demonstrated that the appropriate measure of equity value required consideration of consolidated enterprise earnings rather than holding company taxable income
- Course-of-performance evidence: Showed that consolidated earnings before income taxes had been consistently used over time for compensation calculations and performance evaluation
- Accounting rigor: Applied GAAP based principles to explain why forgiven PPP debt properly flows through earnings before income taxes
- Clear expert rebuttal: Identified fundamental flaws in the opposing financial methodology, including exclusion of the enterprise’s primary value-generating operations
The Deliverables
Based on Weaver’s forensic accounting, valuation and expert witness services, the arbitration tribunal issued a merits award resolving all substantive liability and damages issues in the client’s favor, with only attorneys’ fees and certain arbitration costs reserved for a subsequent phase.
The arbitration tribunal rejected the opposing party’s zero-value equity position and awarded the client approximately $10 million in combined equity and compensation related damages, together with post award interest. The opposing party’s counterclaim was dismissed.
©2026
Success Story