Article
Brochure
Executive Resource
Insight Hub
Ext. Publication
VideoNew York’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Law: What Large Companies Need to Know
Never miss a thing.
Sign up to receive our insights newsletter.
New York Senate Bill S9072A, known as the Climate Corporate Accountability Act, would require large business entities operating in New York to disclose annually greenhouse gas emissions, including Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3, with phased assurance requirements. The bill passed the New York Senate in February 2026 and is currently under consideration in the Assembly.
Why It Matters
The proposed framework is comparable to California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act in its revenue threshold, Scope 1-3 reporting requirements and phased third-party assurance structure. However, unlike California’s broader climate disclosure regime, which includes a separate climate risk reporting requirement, S9072A focuses solely on emissions disclosure rather than TCFD-style climate risk reporting.
While the legislation remains under consideration, the proposed structure reflects a growing interest in state-level corporate emissions regulation. This proposal signals a shift: climate reporting at the corporate level is moving from voluntary sustainability communication to regulated, assured disclosure. Specifics include:
- Applies to companies operating in New York with more than $1 billion in annual revenue
- Requires annual disclosure of Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions
- Introduces phased third-party assurance beginning in 2028
- Provides for civil penalties of up to $100,000 per day for willful noncompliance
- Is modeled closely after California’s corporate climate disclosure law
What the Bill Requires
The proposed legislation would require annual disclosure of Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 value chain emissions, along with third-party assurance over reported data. Disclosures would follow applicable Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards. The requirements would apply at the entity level rather than the individual facility level.
Who is in Scope
The bill would apply to business entities that operate in New York and generate more than $1 billion in annual revenue. A headquarters location would not determine whether a company is subject to the requirements. Companies based outside New York could also be covered if they meet the revenue threshold and conduct business in the state.
Phased Implementation Timeline
2028 – Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from the prior fiscal year with limited assurance
2029 – Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions with limited assurance
2032 – Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions with reasonable assurance
If enacted, additional implementation details would be established through regulatory rulemaking.
Governance and Enforcement Exposure
S9072A would introduce governance and enforcement implications that may require greater oversight and stronger internal controls:
- Increased CFO and audit committee oversight
- Formalized internal controls over emissions data
- Documentation sufficient to support third-party assurance
- Accountability for public disclosures
Under the proposed legislation, the Attorney General could pursue civil penalties of up to $100,000 per day for willful noncompliance, including failure to file or comply with reporting standards.
Capital Markets and Investor Implications
As climate disclosure requirements develop at the state level, lenders, insurers and private equity sponsors are increasingly incorporating emissions data into underwriting, portfolio reporting and valuation processes.
Public availability of emissions data may influence investor scrutiny, insurance pricing and access to capital.
Scope 3 Complexity and Execution Risk
For many organizations, Scope 3 emissions represent the majority of total emissions. Obtaining reliable data from suppliers, portfolio companies and value chain partners remains one of the greatest challenges of corporate climate disclosure.
- Supplier engagement and data quality challenges
- Defining reporting boundaries across complex corporate structures
- Inconsistent methodologies across jurisdictions
- Insufficient controls to support assurance
Strategic Significance
S9072A signals continued momentum toward state-level corporate emissions regulation modeled on California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act.
Jurisdictions such as Illinois, Washington, New Jersey and Colorado have advanced climate-related financial risk, environmental disclosure, or corporate transparency proposals in recent legislative sessions. While not all mirror California’s full Scope 1-3 disclosure structure, these proposals reflect growing interest in corporate emissions transparency.
In the absence of uniform federal regulation, a multi-state compliance environment could emerge. Companies operating nationally may face overlapping but not identical reporting obligations across major U.S. markets, requiring scalable data systems and consistent governance structures.
Organizations that build repeatable, assurance-ready emissions frameworks now will be better positioned as additional states introduce comparable requirements and capital markets continue integrating emissions performance into underwriting and valuation decisions.
Disciplined preparation today reduces compliance risk and positions organizations to respond effectively as emissions disclosure and climate governance expectations continue to evolve.
How Weaver Can Help
Weaver helps organizations prepare for emerging climate disclosure requirements through greenhouse gas emissions quantification, reporting readiness assessments and internal controls development. Our sustainability professionals also assist with Scope 3 data collection, methodology design and preparation for third-party assurance. For companies operating across multiple jurisdictions, Weaver can help assess overlapping reporting requirements and develop consistent, scalable processes to support compliance as regulations evolve. Contact us for more information.
©2026
